From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Jul 12 15:31:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from p.funk.org (node1484.a2000.nl [62.108.20.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B8F14CE1 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:31:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alexlh@p.funk.org) Received: (from alexlh@localhost) by p.funk.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA25713; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 00:30:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from alexlh) Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 00:30:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Alex Le Heux Message-Id: <199907122230.AAA25713@p.funk.org> To: kris@airnet.net, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3C905 versus Intel Etherexpress PRO/100?! In-Reply-To: References: Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org We're talking about a 2% difference in cpu utilisation here. Is that even statistically significant? Even if it is, the difference is tiny, and probably mostly in the driver. Use whichever card works best on the OS you use it on. Alex In list.freebsd.chat, you wrote: >I'd like to know what they did here, because in my own experience the >evidence points the other way. > > >-- >Kris Kirby > >------------------------------------------- >TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message -- +--------------------------------+-------------------+ | SMTP: | E-Gold: 101979 | | ICBM: N52 22.64'6 E4 51.54'1 | PGP: 0x1d512a3f | +--------------------------------+-------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message