From owner-cvs-all Thu Jul 5 20:36: 1 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo.feral.com [192.67.166.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863F537B406; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 20:35:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from beppo (mjacob@beppo [192.67.166.79]) by beppo.feral.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f663ZkS37281; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 20:35:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 20:35:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob X-Sender: mjacob@beppo Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Darren Reed Cc: dfr@nlsystems.com, jhb@FreeBSD.org, dillon@earth.backplane.com, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, jake@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys systm.h condvar.h src/sys/kern kern_ In-Reply-To: <200107060029.KAA16561@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Hmm, after thinking about it some, it would appear to me, at least, that > the wakeup()/sleep() API is not well suited to the task it used to serve > in an SMP environment. Hmm? sleep/wakeup is semantically identical to cv_wait/cv_broadcast I guess I'm not getting your comment. -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message