From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 19 23:43:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43F316A401 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:43:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFB013C4C1 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:43:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2JN5nbH033971 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:05:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: acpi@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:26:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703191726.30337.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:05:49 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/2875/Mon Mar 19 14:51:01 2007 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: Subject: acpi_acad(4) stopped working X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:43:39 -0000 I updated my laptop this weekend to the latest current (previous OS was from around May 20, 2006) and some things now seem to work nicely. One regression I've noticed though is that acpi_acad0 no longer "notices" when the power plug is pulled or re-inserted. I do know that this worked fine on the old kernel. Anyone have any ideas off the top of their head before I dig into this deeper? -- John Baldwin