Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:21:15 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: Mike Karels <mike@karels.net>, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 24e1824e4646 - main - Deprecate telnet daemon Message-ID: <5c162710def7eb94c032dfab73e9560e@lerctr.org> In-Reply-To: <Yyt%2BEOM/Bnth88Xv@FreeBSD.org> References: <202209211517.28LFHkoJ089471@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20220921163951.17C77AC@slippy.cwsent.com> <8EC34FC3-F299-4B03-AD4E-83D062D0E9F6@karels.net> <Yyt%2BEOM/Bnth88Xv@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/21/2022 4:11 pm, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Mike, > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 01:02:17PM -0500, Mike Karels wrote: > M> I have no problem with deprecating (or removing) telnetd in base. I > M> think the client should remain, though. I use it frequently, > although > M> not on the telnet port. ftp* are another issue; anonymous FTP is a > M> perfectly reasonable usage. I use it to download FreeBSD images > often. > > Is there any service where telnet to a port would be preferred over > nc(1)? telnet <host> <port> is basically finger memory (at least for me), and nc isn't in base (AFAIR) -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 5708 Sabbia Dr, Round Rock, TX 78665-2106
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5c162710def7eb94c032dfab73e9560e>