From owner-freebsd-net Tue Nov 27 12:45:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E7737B41A for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:45:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (arr@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.6/8.11.5) with SMTP id fARKiwp19304; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:44:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from arr@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: arr owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:44:57 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" X-Sender: arr@fledge.watson.org To: "Bruce A. Mah" Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: MFC M_ZERO usage for bpf.c In-Reply-To: <200111272040.fARKeea01058@nimitz.packetdesign.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Yea, I think MFC'ing it would be fine. Don't hesitate to thwap me one if you guys think I should MFC some things Im not. Cheers, Andrew On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Bruce A. Mah wrote: :If memory serves me right, "Andrew R. Reiter" wrote: : :> Just as a note, I decided against MFC'ing this and similar changes because :> I didn't feel it was necesary for -STABLE to have this "fix." : :I agree it's not necessary. I'm reviewing some other BPF patches :(which have been sitting in my queue for way too long) and I wanted to :sync up bpf.c on HEAD and RELENG_4 a little bit before diving in. : :Bruce. : : : -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org arr@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message