From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 26 08:59:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA00253 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 08:59:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpha.xerox.com (omega.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.95]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA29999 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 08:59:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@parc.xerox.com) Received: from mango.parc.xerox.com ([13.1.102.232]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <40661(1)>; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 08:58:22 PDT Received: from mango.parc.xerox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mango.parc.xerox.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA18471; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 08:58:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@mango.parc.xerox.com) Message-Id: <199806261558.IAA18471@mango.parc.xerox.com> To: njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk (Niall Smart) cc: Bill Fenner , Julian Elischer , Nate Lawson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Apparent bug in sendto() with raw sockets In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Jun 1998 06:04:38 PDT." Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 08:58:18 PDT From: Bill Fenner Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message you write: >I think its more important to be correct in this area, raw sockets >programming can be tricky enough without what will seem to the >user like gratuitous changes. Changing the interface from what it currently is is a gratuitous change. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message