From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May  8 00:42:03 2008
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A22106567F;
	Thu,  8 May 2008 00:42:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jasone@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from canonware.com (canonware.com [64.183.146.166])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE298FC13;
	Thu,  8 May 2008 00:42:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jasone@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [192.168.168.201] (unknown [192.168.168.201])
	by canonware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D72129859;
	Wed,  7 May 2008 17:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48224C59.7090005@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 17:42:01 -0700
From: Jason Evans <jasone@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Kabaev <kan@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200805071539.m47FdYWZ033147@repoman.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200805071539.m47FdYWZ033147@repoman.freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc Versions.def
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 00:42:03 -0000

Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> kan         2008-05-07 15:39:34 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     lib/libc             Versions.def 
>   Log:
>   Keep versions on a dependency chain to exclude even remote possiblity
>   of private version ever getting index 2.

Why is this the right thing to do?  Clearly FBSDprivate_1.0 should never 
be incremented, but it does not make sense to me to have it depend on 
any other version.  In the absence of a compelling argument, I am of the 
opinion that Dan Eischen made a good change.  Did you discuss this issue 
with him?

Jason