Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 21:07:30 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su> To: John Capo <jc@irbs.com> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freefall.cdrom.com> Subject: Re: mb_map full with GATEWAY and maxusers 64! Message-ID: <pSIbkxlaU5@astral.msk.su> In-Reply-To: <199506261640.MAA06473@irbs.irbs.com>; from John Capo at Mon, 26 Jun 1995 12:40:25 -0400 (EDT) References: <199506261640.MAA06473@irbs.irbs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199506261640.MAA06473@irbs.irbs.com> John Capo writes: >=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka writes: >> >> Just got it in -current :-( >> Normal load, not many users, just few telnets, two editors... >I have seen it with maxusers at 48 and 96 on a lightly loaded system. >I switched to NMBCLUSTERS=2048 and have not seen it since. Maybe we need simple increase NMBCLUSTERS calculation as default to something like: #ifdef GATEWAY #define NMBCLUSTERS (2048 + maxusers * 16) #else #define NMBCLUSTERS (1024 + maxusers * 16) #endif Any opinions? -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?pSIbkxlaU5>