From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 22 07:36:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1603430A7 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lysfjord.daniel@smokepit.net) Received: from smtp-out.smokepit.net (smtp-out.smokepit.net [18.200.56.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp-out.smokepit.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49r1Sb4nkzz4Jb3 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:36:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lysfjord.daniel@smokepit.net) Received: from cm-84.215.33.184.getinternet.no ([84.215.33.184] helo=smokepit.net) by smtp-out.smokepit.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnH0Y-0002kD-FD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:36:46 +0000 Received: from yggdrasil.lan.smokepit.net ([10.0.0.200]) by smokepit.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1jnH0X-0006Zp-FZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:36:45 +0200 Subject: Re: Exim - retry time not reached for any host To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2534646.NQNxk83B2J@curlew> <40ca3e9d-2859-6428-e7ad-c1b2dff36a69@smokepit.net> <1954651.YXp4yczo3S@curlew> <2bb9b869-087f-0de7-a092-5753e6528a10@smokepit.net> From: Daniel Lysfjord Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:36:45 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2bb9b869-087f-0de7-a092-5753e6528a10@smokepit.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Report: Action: no action Symbol: ARC_NA(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00) Symbol: BAYES_HAM(-2.79) Symbol: FROM_HAS_DN(0.00) Symbol: TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00) Symbol: MIME_GOOD(-0.10) Symbol: TO_DN_NONE(0.00) Symbol: RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00) Symbol: FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00) Symbol: MIME_TRACE(0.00) Symbol: RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00) Symbol: MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00) Message-ID: c4d55ab3-e90a-0658-c0e4-0c8d606ca102@smokepit.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49r1Sb4nkzz4Jb3 X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.53 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[smokepit.net:s=loke]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.018]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:18.200.56.156:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.04)[-1.037]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[smokepit.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[smokepit.net,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.48)[-0.480]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:18.200.0.0/16, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[84.215.33.184:received] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 07:36:48 -0000 On 22.06.2020 08:58, Daniel Lysfjord via freebsd-questions wrote: > On 21.06.2020 23:33, Mike Clarke wrote: >> On Saturday, 20 June 2020 01:07:04 BST Daniel Lysfjord via >> freebsd-questions wrote: >>> On 19.06.2020 17:57, Mike Clarke wrote: >>> [..] >>> >>>> So it looks very much like the problem lies somewhere in my system even >>>> though there's been no changes made recently. I'd appreciate >>>> suggestions >>>> on how I should go about tracing and fixing the cause of this problem. >>> >>> Have you tried to start exim with "-bd -d+all" to get some debug output? >> >> >> OK, I've done that now and it's highlighted what's happening, though >> I'm not sure if it helps to >> explain why; >> >> >> To summarise it looks like the SSL connection fails but eventually >> succeeds after a number of >> retries although the delay could be an hour or more. >> >> >> As a workaround I've reverted exim from 4.94 to 4.93.0.4 which does >> not appear to suffer from this >> problem. >> [..] > > Can't see anything wrong with that part of the config. The exim4 > changelog between 4.93 and 4.94 is quite long, and many things have > changed. You could try to bisect, of course. > > Did 4.94 fail to connect every time, or was it sporadic? To clarify: did 4.94 fail to connect every time on a *new* email?