From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jul  2 13:18:46 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (c421509-a.pinol1.sfba.home.com [24.7.86.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF88837B403
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon,  2 Jul 2001 13:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (InterJet.elischer.org [192.168.1.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA13710;
	Mon, 2 Jul 2001 14:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 14:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@sneakerz.org>
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Kernel thread system nomenclature.
In-Reply-To: <20010702145414.R84523@sneakerz.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107021441550.13213-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> Oh what a bikeshed you've begun. :)
> 
> Proc, this keeps the unix convention, a task is confusing, at least
> to me because afaik in Linux a task is actually a thread.  Keeping it
> as proc will also require fewer changes to the code. :)
Actually this would REDUCE teh size of the change..

MOST of the proc pointers will be changeing to #4 whatever that becomes.
calling THAT proc would be the easiest :-)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message