From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 20 01:37:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B175116A401 for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 01:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thompsa@freebsd.org) Received: from heff.fud.org.nz (203-109-251-39.static.bliink.ihug.co.nz [203.109.251.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C3C13C46A for ; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 01:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thompsa@freebsd.org) Received: by heff.fud.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4A7111CC51; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:37:20 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 14:37:20 +1300 From: Andrew Thompson To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Message-ID: <20070120013720.GC23991@heff.fud.org.nz> References: <20070118035748.GE12548@heff.fud.org.nz> <20070118082139.W82671@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070118082139.W82671@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC rstp X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 01:37:21 -0000 On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:24:14AM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Andrew Thompson wrote: > > Hi, > > >I have a patch here to MFC the rstp code to RELENG_6. It should be all > >fine and dandy as for API but will cause the default spanning tree > >version to change from stp to rstp. > > > >Is it ok to change the protocol version for the STABLE users (rstp is > >backwards compatable with stp) or should it still default to stp and > >require the OP to enable rstp. > > > >Any opinions? > > I think you should leave stp as default and have the user configure rstp > if (s)he thinks (s)he needs it. Yes, I think thats the safest. It will just need a bit more info in the man page so people know it exists. Andrew