From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Nov 10 20:48: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.energyinteractive.com (mail.energyinteractive.com [204.217.253.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD8414DBA for ; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 20:48:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frf@energyinteractive.com) Received: from eimail.energyinteractive.com (primary.energyinteractive.com [204.217.253.254]) by mail.energyinteractive.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA77961 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 20:48:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frf@energyinteractive.com) Received: from energyinteractive.com ([192.168.20.5]) by eimail.energyinteractive.com (Netscape Messaging Server 3.5) with ESMTP id 381 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 20:50:13 -0800 Message-ID: <382A4A86.20933491@energyinteractive.com> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 20:48:06 -0800 From: "Robert Faulds" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: trailing slash and mount(8)? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Why is 'mount /foo/' different from 'mount /foo'? If I have an entry in fstab of /dev/da0g /foo/ ufs ro,noauto 1 1 'mount /foo' fails, and vice versa, but umount(8) seems to do what I expect, which is ignore the trailing slash. Is there a reason for this? Just a curiosity, Robert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message