From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 1 15:09:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA14966 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 15:09:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from jmb@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA14957; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 15:09:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmb) From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" Message-Id: <199810012209.PAA14957@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: perl5: h2ph broken? In-Reply-To: <19980930234707.A24498@keltia.freenix.fr> from Ollivier Robert at "Sep 30, 98 11:47:07 pm" To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 15:09:31 -0700 (PDT) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Jos Backus: > > lists I'm on; of those, the ones run by ezmlm are especially fast. Of course, > > this could be a function of their size, I can't tell. I do know that qmail is > > used on a number of very large listservers, with excellent results. > > VMailer is due in now around 2 weeks. I can say as an alpha tester that it > rocks and is very fast (without the main flaw IMHO of Qmail with one > message per recipient). > > VMailer is already used -- although with an old version -- on at least > freebsd-chat (Hi Jonathan !). > > I've seen a speed difference for a list with 20 (!) subscribers. > > Opinions about Qmail/VMailer in private mail please. once vmailer is released, i will be converting the lists to vmailer starting with -chat (to check the new version) followed rapidly by all the rest of the lists. i believe that vmailer will be worth waiting for ;) jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message