From owner-freebsd-current Thu Sep 17 14:15:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03657 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 17 Sep 1998 14:15:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from server.amis.net (server.amis.net [195.10.52.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA03406 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 1998 14:14:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blaz@gold.amis.net) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by server.amis.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with UUCP id XAA05981 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Sep 1998 23:14:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (blaz@localhost) by gold.amis.net (8.9.1/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA00310 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 1998 23:13:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 23:13:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Blaz Zupan To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Bogus rc.devfs? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG While merging all the /etc changes on my machine I noticed the new rc.devfs and put it in place just in case if I every decide to turn on DEVFS. But looking at the script, it seems bogus. And then looking at the effect of it, it still looks bogus. It is creating a link from vga to ttyv0, but in / instead of /dev. Or am I missing something obvious? ;) Blaz Zupan, blaz@medinet.si, http://home.amis.net/blaz Medinet d.o.o., Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message