From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 19 17:43:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BED2106566B for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@johnea.net) Received: from mail.johnea.net (johnea.net [70.167.123.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7FC8FC08 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.100.166] (traveler.johnea.net [192.168.100.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.johnea.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78E1D73F187F for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:25:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F41303D.8060409@johnea.net> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 09:24:13 -0800 From: freebsd@johnea.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120202 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <20120217120034.201EB106574C@hub.freebsd.org> <20120217152400.261AC106564A@hub.freebsd.org> <20120217194851.D76DE1065670@hub.freebsd.org> <4F412850.3020705@mschuette.name> In-Reply-To: <4F412850.3020705@mschuette.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: periodic security run output gives false positives after 1 year X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:43:06 -0000 On 2012-02-19 08:50, Martin Schütte wrote: > On 17.02.2012 20:48, Roger Marquis wrote: >> and difficult to change without breaking more than it fixes. The current >> syslog syntax timestamp has been reliable now for what, 25+ years? I >> don't personally see any measurable ROI from changing it. YMMV of >> course. > > I really understand the concern, but some requirements do change over > time. Staying at the lowest common denominator for 25+ years may > indicate robustness, but it may also indicate obsolence. > What seems obsolete is this thread. Can you at least prepended [OT RANT] to the subject? Some people monitor this list to be informed of possible FreeBSD security issues, of which this isn't. Please, get a motel room or something... johnea