Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 12:32:20 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt.with_pgp Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970523122540.736C-100000@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <19970522151520.39294@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 May 1997, David O'Brien wrote: > > ache 1997/05/19 11:04:09 PDT > > > > Modified files: > > mail/mutt.with_pgp Makefile > > Log: > > Enable DSN,POP,8BITMIME,flock > > Disable fcntl > > As maintainer, I would rather this have been commited thru me. Sorry. I don't think that this changes are big enough to discuss. > Also, if I know about this (flock -> fcntl) change, I can work with me > (the author) to make it so this is default for FreeBSD. All FreeBSD mail programs use flock now. Fcntl have some disadvantages, see fcntl man page f.e. > Also, is 8BITMIME beign for *all* users? > I just check the Bat book, and I'm not sure exactly what the implications > of this change are. (I seldomly get mail that isn't 7-bit US-ASCII). We ship FreeBSD with sendmail by default which understand 8BITMIME well. Users with other MTA (non-default case) supposed to make needed changes by themselfs. Many mail ports already assume sendmail in any case. > Since my I haven't kept up with sendmail 8.8 changes, and Bat book > doesn't discuss DCN (its 1st ed). So I have no idea of the implications > of this change? DSN also works well with sendmail which shipped by default as I already say. Some mail ports already use DSN too. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970523122540.736C-100000>