From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jan 21 15:48: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rah.star-gate.com (216-200-29-190.snj0.flashcom.net [216.200.29.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AE0158F1 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:48:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA22521; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:46:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <200001212346.PAA22521@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Andre Oppermann Cc: "Louis A. Mamakos" , Garance A Drosihn , John Polstra , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Please help spread the CVSup mirror load more evenly In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Jan 2000 00:13:08 +0100." <3888E804.1BA82919@pipeline.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:46:17 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > My only point is that the first response to a problem isn't to necessarily > > pull out emacs and start hacking away on code. > > Yea, it is easier to do in a regular zone file then to implement the > network measurement logic into cvsup. Yes, it is a rather cool idea to rotate on the cvs servers without respect to latency, work load or rate of service response from the server. -- Amancio Hasty hasty@rah.star-gate.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message