Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 16:50:14 +0000 (GMT) From: Nils M Holm <nmh@freenet.de> To: will@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/22048: New port: devel/TIDE Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1010407164440.259A-100000@Freefall.UUCP> In-Reply-To: <200104070724.f377Ojm45432@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001 will@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: New port: devel/TIDE > > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed > State-Changed-By: will > State-Changed-When: Sat Apr 7 00:23:40 PDT 2001 > State-Changed-Why: > I updated this port to 1.3, and encountered this: > > ===> Extracting for tide-13 > >> Checksum OK for tide-13.tar.gz. > ===> tide-13 depends on executable: tx - found > ===> Patching for tide-13 > ===> Configuring for tide-13 > ===> Building for tide-13 > (cd T3Xtools; make -f Makefile.BSD) > tx -i config.t > SYSTEM Ccannot open SYSTEM module: system.so > *** Error code 255 > > Not knowing much about T3X, I defer to you for help. BTW, > your lang/t3x port really needs to be cleaned up, considering > the rather illegal @cwd directive in the plist. :( > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=22048 The TIDE Makefile lacks a MAKE_ENV = T3XDIR=/usr/local/t3x/r6 but I am currently packaging new releases, so I am going to fix this myself. What's wrong with the @cwd directive? Would it be an appropriate fix to remove it, since pkg_create generates one? Is there anything else wrong with the t3x port? I wanted to submit a new release *today*, so a quick pointer would be really appreciated. Bye, nmh. -- Nils M Holm <nmh@t3x.org> -- http://www.t3x.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.1010407164440.259A-100000>