From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Dec 27 18:07:27 1994
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id SAA04348 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 27 Dec 1994 18:07:27 -0800
Received: from seagull.rtd.com (root@Seagull.rtd.com [198.102.68.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA04338 for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com>; Wed, 28 Dec 1994 02:07:24 GMT
Received: (from dgy@localhost) by seagull.rtd.com (8.6.9/8.6.9.1) id TAA16982 for freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com; Tue, 27 Dec 1994 19:06:50 -0700
From: Don Yuniskis <dgy@seagull.rtd.com>
Message-Id: <199412280206.TAA16982@seagull.rtd.com>
Subject: fork() in unistd.h
To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com (FreeBSD hackers)
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 1994 19:06:49 -0700 (MST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 213       
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Greetings!
   /usr/include/unistd.h for 1.1.5.1R contains two (conflicting)
prototypes for fork().  One is conditional on POSIX... should
the other be inversely conditioned?  Or, removed altogether??
  Thx, --don