From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 13:27:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D798B1065715; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from valentin.bud@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391208FC20; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from valentin.bud@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id h3so245672nfh.33 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:27:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=oilfo8NbR7Z/yxzQp9X0UBPeCPYLkUmuKRjTju+2mXg=; b=Nfz0yuoKnzrlyLm+RRwP+Y348IFmkSDYGgWvhzM8P8OGbC583Z4N1kaGE1v+sVhel+ ynk8pCCUKSFU0mbz1spJXSMwGY0VuCcM+dbJ37D973ikL5Gj/hbT1xDzrQuUkvWoyrfo alBW2zrxioN2N3W5y7rX0S84906DaWcK6VEz8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=kH/FV0tteqzhsZMac9CKgu3cNfw3mknMiKMPcje9VHZkyxe5JPwWF/Ff4gzaKTz7+b TU7CfTxSpGPolR6GUwj6uTMVBbY+XHLGAEAuQFyi3aBU49jOuyfyBxOe5iLViknCTToS xn2xK165+AhgPVUvYT/0ooVlMPqZrfAUJ1fK0= Received: by 10.210.66.13 with SMTP id o13mr798658eba.172.1229088444670; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:27:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.210.59.2 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:27:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <139b44430812120527w7b22d8a1m860cbf308e4b67c3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:27:24 +0200 From: "Valentin Bud" To: "Wojciech Puchar" In-Reply-To: <20081212141156.E4001@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <139b44430812112348k5c51072ie771913c982f7cfe@mail.gmail.com> <49422A05.6050907@gmail.com> <20081212120557.V3687@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <9bbcef730812120426t3c4b8a28q337c8379cd947702@mail.gmail.com> <20081212141156.E4001@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Ivan Voras , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Centralized DB of "system" users X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:27:27 -0000 On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Wojciech Puchar < wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > this case (though it's very complicated to set up, especially the first >>>> >>> >>> why it is "right" solution? >>> >> >> Interoperability. Today, with Linux, tomorrow, Windows or Mac OS X. >> > > so not "right" but interoperable. if i do have only unix systems in LAN, > NIS is much better easier and faster. If you only have UNIX systems in LAN. But in my case i have Linux + FreeBSD (server). From the handbook NIS only works between FBSDs. Am i missing something? thank you, v > > > for windows-only LAN with unix server, simply using samba is OK. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >