From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul  7 19:18:38 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8449E16A468;
	Sat,  7 Jul 2007 19:18:38 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F030E13C458;
	Sat,  7 Jul 2007 19:18:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l67JIaXd004481;
	Sat, 7 Jul 2007 23:18:36 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nagual.pp.ru;
	s=default; t=1183835916; bh=0f6TEyH534BwEfLT4IJklLt9hMU8KUMovtFVmm6
	dW9c=; l=533; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:
	Mail-Followup-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:
	Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent; b=m6u0Qmz2kir7ry4wVPBY
	zUl77JP3jHDTWMK8EcfdTKSE8zaNYbp68DamQ0YodKnhtwyd8keHenmWqwBRXf27qTd
	rR5yjtKzSvqQCxz8J0jngxS9cBAv9gv+yR+m7UaX3dvMXd2MldzoTC+qns/075mQe29
	hHA1WCno6uRAH9y+I=
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l67JIa6a004480;
	Sat, 7 Jul 2007 23:18:36 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache)
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 23:18:35 +0400
From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To: "Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20070707191835.GA4368@nagual.pp.ru>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>,
	"Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org>,
	Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>,
	freebsd-current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>,
	Michal Mertl <mime@traveller.cz>
References: <20070704180000.GA34042@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20070704144159.X77978@thor.farley.org>
	<20070704195939.GA35302@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20070704235630.GA42227@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20070704215154.O77978@thor.farley.org>
	<20070705115816.GA50506@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20070705105922.F98700@thor.farley.org>
	<20070707130859.GA96605@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20070707131359.GB96605@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20070707133102.C14065@thor.farley.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070707133102.C14065@thor.farley.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>,
	Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, Michal Mertl <mime@traveller.cz>
Subject: Re: Environment handling broken in /bin/sh with changes to
	{get,set,put}env()
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:18:38 -0000

On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 01:51:11PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> I agree that it would be faster for a subset of an existing environ.  On
> the other hand, in the case of emptying the environment, my method would
> be faster since no deallocation, allocation nor setenv() calls would be
> called assuming putenv() was not used.  I could try a few tests to see
> what is faster in which case, but I do not think environ changes happen
> often enough to make speed a factor.

Well, lets go with that.

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/