From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 5 17:49:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA02303 for current-outgoing; Mon, 5 May 1997 17:49:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA02296 for ; Mon, 5 May 1997 17:49:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id RAA18261; Mon, 5 May 1997 17:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bubba.whistle.com(207.76.205.7) by whistle.com via smap (V1.3) id sma018257; Mon May 5 17:48:39 1997 Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id RAA10274; Mon, 5 May 1997 17:48:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199705060048.RAA10274@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: divert still broken? In-Reply-To: from Andrzej Bialecki at "May 5, 97 10:07:09 pm" To: abial@korin.warman.org.pl (Andrzej Bialecki) Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 17:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Cc: current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL25 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I'm doing some more work on ipfw and divert to solve a need we have... > > and planning on making these changes (how much gets checked in to be > > determined later by group consensus, but patch will be available): > > On the same subject: how much work would it require to shift the NAT code > (from ppp -alias, or natd) to the kernel space (LKM ?) ? I think it would > tremendously enhance the performance of the NAT setup, allowing for much > greater throughput. Just my twopence... I think ipfilter does this already... -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com