From owner-cvs-all Sat Dec 23 18: 0:18 2000 From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 23 18:00:14 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (poynting.physics.purdue.edu [128.210.146.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0054F37B402; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 18:00:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from argon.firepipe.net (pm007-009.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.81.41]) by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC56619EA; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 21:00:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by argon.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 432431909; Sat, 23 Dec 2000 20:55:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 20:55:27 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Bill Fumerola Cc: Alexander Langer , Andreas Klemm , Andreas Klemm , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/apsfilter Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/print/apsfilter/scripts configure Message-ID: <20001223205526.B15046@argon.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , Bill Fumerola , Alexander Langer , Andreas Klemm , Andreas Klemm , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200012231328.eBNDS4Y67614@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001223122211.Y72273@elvis.mu.org> <20001223194942.A92298@titan.klemm.gtn.com> <20001223203235.A1011@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20001223135503.A72273@elvis.mu.org> <20001223210626.E1011@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20001223143010.C72273@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001223143010.C72273@elvis.mu.org>; from billf@mu.org on Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:30:10PM -0600 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: will@argon.firepipe.net Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 02:30:10PM -0600, Bill Fumerola wrote: > It would be nice to have both pieces of history (and as long as no > one cleans out apsfilter6, we will always have both), but there is > no way to superimpose apsfilter6's history on top of apsfilter. > > The end result (having one port named apsfilter be the one and only > apsfilter port) is more important then somehow having both pieces > of history in one RCS file. Andreas certainly could have just used a branch tag on the original apsfilter port to track apsfilter 6.x. I don't usually see much point in having ports for both devel and stable versions of the same program. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message