Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:30:32 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <867ir2tibr.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4651884F.3080207@FreeBSD.org> (Florent Thoumie's message of "Mon\, 21 May 2007 12\:53\:51 %2B0100") References: <200705211021.l4LALdGa025468@repoman.freebsd.org> <86k5v2tnhv.fsf@dwp.des.no> <4651884F.3080207@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote: > > Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > > Log: > > > Fix USE_XLIB to depend on stub file rather than libX11. > > Is this intended as a permanent solution? I realize that having > > USE_XLIB the way it is allows us to support both X.org and XFree86, but > > I would much prefer to see USE_XLIB replaced with something similar to > > USE_XORG, explicitly listing the required libraries. > No this is not permanent. Once we removed XFree86-4, we'll start > removing USE_XLIB in favor of USE_XORG. OK, I didn't realize we were going to remove XFree86 altogether (for the record, I'm in favor) Extending the USE_XLIB syntax would still be useful, as it would allow maintainers to start migrating to the new syntax while remaining compatible with XFree86-4, but it's not a big deal. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867ir2tibr.fsf>