From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 4 9:14:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48E937B401 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:14:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EA743EC5 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:14:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2098A8766; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 13:14:45 -0400 (AST) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 13:14:45 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Jeff MacDonald Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Another Jail Question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20021204131301.K36076-100000@hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote: > Yeah, i think i'll go the safe route and keep away from shared memory as > such will likly run it on the host. not sure what your sparc is, but you might look at putting postgresql over there, which might allow you to create a larger cache buffer ... at the University, our firewall logs to PostgreSQL, and has a 1gig cache buffer to handle it, but it all depends on what you are doing with the database ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message