Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 23:26:53 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Doug Denault <doug@safeport.com> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: (a bit offtopic) KDE2.1.1 install Message-ID: <20010710232653.K97456@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1010711001313.13995C-100000@fledge.watson.org>; from doug@safeport.com on Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 12:22:43AM -0400 References: <20010710175003.Y97456@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <Pine.BSF.3.96.1010711001313.13995C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 12:22:43AM -0400, Doug Denault (doug@safeport.com) wrote: > 1) Either here (questions) or on the KDE list archives, someone > mentioned using a c++ optimization which would speed up execution at > the cost of removing some stuff, useful to debugging I think. > > Can/should that be the default for the port? Possibly. Depends on exactly what sort of optimization you're talking about. > 2) Some of the apps (e.g., korganizer) have bugs that have apparently > been fixed in the KDE CVS. Can they be pulled down and installed > piecemeal? Not without making things a huge pain to update. And generally, putting something in ports to support CVS updates is a pain. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010710232653.K97456>