From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 2 23:55:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A840137B401 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 23:55:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2640643F75 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 23:55:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-2ivfj2f.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.247.204.79] helo=mindspring.com) by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19N5hr-0001N1-00; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 23:55:39 -0700 Message-ID: <3EDC4627.E40F8DC2@mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 23:54:31 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gordon Tetlow References: <20030602171942.GA87863@roark.gnf.org> <20030602201337.GD87863@roark.gnf.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4c7db0bac6e47487f14ded1b7a0b23a70350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Making a dynamically-linked root X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 06:55:41 -0000 Gordon Tetlow wrote: > You need to realize that with the advent of rcNG that their are alot > of additional shell invocations. Also bear in mind that your dynamic > web content and SMTP servers are already going to be dynamically linked. > In fact, the thing that will be hardest hit will be the boot scripts. You'd think it'd be possible to take all the scripts and put them together into one script, and cache a copy of it for the next invocation, with a single uncoelesced stub script that checked the dates on the files vs. the cached copy, and regenereated a new cached copy, if the cached copy were older than any of the files. -- Terry