From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu May 28 18:34:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA17043 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Thu, 28 May 1998 18:34:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from germanium.xtalwind.net (germanium.xtalwind.net [205.160.242.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA17024 for ; Thu, 28 May 1998 18:34:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jack@germanium.xtalwind.net) Received: from localhost (jack@localhost) by germanium.xtalwind.net (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id VAA26854; Thu, 28 May 1998 21:34:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 21:34:00 -0400 (EDT) From: jack To: Tony Kimball cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Better luck with PPro 166 or 180 at 200 MHz? In-Reply-To: <199805281422.JAA02276@compound.east.sun.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 28 May 1998, Tony Kimball wrote: > I'm trying to decide whether to get a pair of 166 or 180 MHz PPro's. > Which has a better probability of running at 200MHz, a pair of > 166MHz 512k cache, or a pair of 180MHz 256k cache? Don't know about the 166, but I've got a 180 that's been running at 200, 24x7, for the past few months without any problems. YMMV. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jack O'Neill Systems Administrator / Systems Analyst jack@germanium.xtalwind.net Crystal Wind Communications, Inc. Finger jack@germanium.xtalwind.net for my PGP key. PGP Key fingerprint = F6 C4 E6 D4 2F 15 A7 67 FD 09 E9 3C 5F CC EB CD enriched, vcard, HTML messages > /dev/null Mail from netcom.com blocked until they stop relaying SPAM -------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message