From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 21 06:40:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C8216A4CE for ; Fri, 21 May 2004 06:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE5843D1D for ; Fri, 21 May 2004 06:40:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BRAGJ-0008SI-00 for ; Fri, 21 May 2004 15:40:35 +0200 Received: from makrothumia.wingnet.net ([206.30.215.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 May 2004 15:40:35 +0200 Received: from jesse by makrothumia.wingnet.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 May 2004 15:40:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Jesse Guardiani Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 09:37:50 -0400 Organization: WingNET Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <20040520185047.GA98339@sirius.firepipe.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: makrothumia.wingnet.net User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 X-Mail-Copies-To: never Sender: news Subject: Re: GEOM portable filesystem abstraction? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jesse@wingnet.net List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 13:40:38 -0000 Will Andrews wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 02:44:06PM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: >> It seems like GEOM functions as a bit of a disk >> abstraction layer in FreeBSD. Would it be possible >> to port the GEOM subsystem as a loadable kernel >> module to Linux (and perhaps other OSes) to >> facilitate pluggable, portable filesystem code? > > GEOM is below the filesystem layer and thus wouldn't help you > with the filesystem portability issue. Well, that's kinda the point. If you want to port filesystems to multiple architectures/OSes, then you need a common underlying infrastructure. I was thinking GEOM might be it. Plus, GEOM makes GBDE encrypted volumes possible. -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net