Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 09:39:42 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Alexander Churanov <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com>, Simon Barner <barner@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: STILL OPEN: ports/129226: update devel/boost from 1.34.1 to 1.37 Message-ID: <20090111083942.GA59145@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <1231629954.10829.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> References: <3cb459ed0901091434y3ec4cb5cr56bf358b527515d7@mail.gmail.com> <1231602062.44156.28.camel@hood.oook.cz> <3cb459ed0901101407m2c72487aqf35ea2c81761290e@mail.gmail.com> <1231629954.10829.0.camel@hood.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Dim 11 jan 09 =E0 0:25:54 +0100, Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> =E9crivait=A0: > > 1) rename devel/boost to devel/boost-134 > > 2) switch all ports depending on devel/boost to devel/boost-134 > > 3) check-in boost-1.37 as devel/boost > > 4) have enough time to fix applications depending on boost-1.34 > > one-by-one > >=20 > > This introduces another level of indirection - a common way to solve > > issues like that >=20 > That's certainly a possibility -- but can two boost versions coexist in > a single system? I don't know, but I know at least one port which is broken and cannot be fixed, because the required upgrade needs a newer boost (cad/freecad). Regards, --=20 Th. Thomas. --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklpsE4ACgkQc95pjMcUBaL4YwCfYfOBd11H5kbqvLpEKIHJmvTx hEoAoJOPWRInI7B1GV1hflYONTa4rPQj =52rv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090111083942.GA59145>