From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 30 09:00:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4561065674 for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 09:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8069F8FC1E for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 09:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4U90Bir031690 for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 09:00:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n4U90BRi031689; Sat, 30 May 2009 09:00:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 09:00:11 GMT Message-Id: <200905300900.n4U90BRi031689@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Mario Pavlov Cc: Subject: Re: kern/135070 [acpi] BIOS resource allocation and FreeBSD ACPI X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mario Pavlov List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 09:00:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/135070; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mario Pavlov To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/135070 [acpi] BIOS resource allocation and FreeBSD ACPI Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 11:35:55 +0300 (EEST) I forgot to mention, I tested this with i386 and amd64 and the behaviour is identical.