From owner-freebsd-current Sat Dec 5 15:15:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA22692 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 5 Dec 1998 15:15:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from silver.gn.iaf.nl (silver.gn.iaf.nl [193.67.144.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA22667 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 1998 15:15:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wilko@yedi.iaf.nl) Received: from uni4nn.gn.iaf.nl (osmium.gn.iaf.nl [193.67.144.12]) by silver.gn.iaf.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA19376; Sun, 6 Dec 1998 00:15:40 +0100 Received: by uni4nn.gn.iaf.nl with UUCP id AA21853 (5.67b/IDA-1.5); Sun, 6 Dec 1998 00:07:29 +0100 Received: (from wilko@localhost) by yedi.iaf.nl (8.8.8/8.6.12) id XAA24795; Sat, 5 Dec 1998 23:23:47 +0100 (CET) From: Wilko Bulte Message-Id: <199812052223.XAA24795@yedi.iaf.nl> Subject: Re: sys/compile directories... In-Reply-To: <199812052215.JAA26976@cimlogic.com.au> from John Birrell at "Dec 6, 98 09:15:52 am" To: jb@cimlogic.com.au (John Birrell) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 23:23:47 +0100 (CET) Cc: mjacob@feral.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Organisation: Private FreeBSD site - Arnhem, The Netherlands X-Pgp-Info: PGP public key at 'finger wilko@freefall.freebsd.org' X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As John Birrell wrote... > Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > Umm, now that we have alpha as well as i386 regularly compiling along, > > would it be conceivable to have the compile directory become either > > sys/compile// or have it as part of sys//compile > > (I probably prefer the latter- but in either case, I use the same sys tree > > for developing both, and two different GENERIC's are a problem..) > > I've already asked for this and received less that favourable responses. > Bruce wanted to have the build use an obj tree. i386 people wanted > not change (POLA). We _do_ need to resolve this issue. It's annoying. It sure *(*&*& is. It just bit me 2 minutes ago.. Not changing it is IMHO not a sensible solution. > With the possibility of support for more architectures coming, it will > only get worse. Very much so yes. Wilko _ ______________________________________________________________________ | / o / / _ Bulte email: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl |/|/ / / /( (_) Arnhem, The Netherlands WWW : http://www.tcja.nl ______________________________________________ Powered by FreeBSD __________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message