From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Aug 27 23:32: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2126737B400 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.thundernet.cz (mail.thundernet.cz [62.77.87.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01CE243E6E for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:32:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from neuhauser@bellavista.cz) Received: (qmail 12080 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2002 06:32:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freepuppy.bellavista.cz) (62.168.44.50) by mail.thundernet.cz with SMTP; 28 Aug 2002 06:32:00 -0000 Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 06FD2E2; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:32:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:31:59 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Ethan Gilchrist Cc: Freebsd-Questions Subject: Re: What should I track? Message-ID: <20020828063159.GQ21595@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Ethan Gilchrist , Freebsd-Questions References: <20020828060203.GB35836@grimoire.chen.org.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > From: "Ethan Gilchrist" > To: "Freebsd-Questions" > Subject: RE: What should I track? > Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:26:27 -0400 don't top-post. also, your MUA mutilates quoted text. can you do something about it? > > From: Jonathan Chen [mailto:jonc@chen.org.nz] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 2:02 AM > > To: Ethan Gilchrist > > Cc: Freebsd-Questions > > Subject: Re: What should I track? > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:34:42PM -0400, Ethan Gilchrist wrote: > > > I've seen on this list so far I'm not sure how stable 4.6 is but I'd > > > like your opinions. > > > > Since you're wanting to learn, go with -STABLE. The -RELEASE versions > > are way too static, and -CURRENT is really for the developers and > > people willing to debug kernel dumps. > > That's what I was thinking as well. Just wanted a second opinion just > to be sure. Thanks bunches! Oh something else I just thought of > though. What about my ports? Should I track those from the same branch > or is it all right to use the head for those? Only cuz I think I might > have fouled that up and selected the head already. If I should pick > one further down the tree how do I go about changing that? the ports are not separated into branches. you can only track HEAD. -- FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE 8:29AM up 7 days, 14:22, 17 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message