Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 12:52:14 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> To: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> Cc: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>, stable@freebsd.org, jonathan@kc8onw.net Subject: Re: ATA APM and NCQ support in FreeBSD atacontrol Message-ID: <4828053E.9080301@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <4827F91E.60102@paradise.net.nz> References: <29626.214.13.212.30.1210554531.squirrel@www.kc8onw.net> <Pine.BSF.3.96.1080512141540.3891B-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au> <53004.80.91.220.50.1210576570.squirrel@www.kc8onw.net> <20080512072316.GA3845@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <58131.80.91.220.50.1210577810.squirrel@www.kc8onw.net> <20080512074541.GA4667@eos.sc1.parodius.com> <4827F91E.60102@paradise.net.nz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Linux has more eyes period, which helps a lot. In addition Linux has > more commercial sponsorship - having said that, I've no idea if libdata > development has had any such sponsorship... As I know the most of active libata developers have full-time job in Linux companies, e.g. in Red Hat. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4828053E.9080301>