From owner-cvs-all Thu Jan 25 22:57:29 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDC837B401; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 22:57:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f0Q6v6U30565; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 07:57:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 07:57:06 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: John Baldwin Cc: Archie Cobbs , Bruce Evans , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, kris@FreeBSD.org, Bill Fumerola Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/tcpdump print-smb.c Message-ID: <20010126075705.A30504@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <200101260115.RAA07722@curve.dellroad.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:53:27PM -0800 Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20010126 02:55], John Baldwin (jhb@FreeBSD.org) wrote: >On 26-Jan-01 Archie Cobbs wrote: >> At the risk of pouring more gasoline on this fire, I still have >> one question.. does MFC'ing the fix patch make things any worse? Nope. >> That is, once a file is off the vendor branch, does MFC'ing the >> fix make things any worse? I'd like to commit this fix to 4.x-stable >> as well (but only if people won't freak out that is). No, the `problem' is only with HEAD. >I think that the vendor branch business only applies to HEAD, i.e. >-current and not side branches, but I'm not 100% sure. You are correct. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best Network- and systemadministrator D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA 7152 035C 1138 546A B867 Misery loves company... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message