Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:59:54 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: ache@FreeBSD.org, rene@FreeBSD.org Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Tons of "sa6_recoverscope: assumption failure" on recent -current Message-ID: <20121119.165954.1302634823989942540.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <50A88D0E.1070301@freebsd.org> <50A9E4D1.8000701@freebsd.org> References: <50A88D0E.1070301@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Nov_19_16_59_54_2012_643)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org> wrote in <50A88D0E.1070301@freebsd.org>: ac> On every IPv6 address of my card and router and every broadcast and= ac> link-local scope addresses I see now: ac> kernel: sa6_recoverscope: assumption failure (non 0 ID): <ipv6 addr= ess> ac> = ac> What does it mean and why there are so many of them? I have plain l= ocal ac> net with IPv6 router, nothing unusual. ac> = ac> IPv6 continues to work despite of those failures. Ren=E9 Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> wrote in <50A9E4D1.8000701@freebsd.org>: re> I'm also seeing them when using a teredo-tunnel over an IPv4 router= , re> r243234-amd64 This warning message itself is not harmful actually, but my commit triggered it. It should be fixed at r243235. Can you let me know if this problem persists even at this revision or later? Thank you. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Nov_19_16_59_54_2012_643)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlCp5voACgkQTyzT2CeTzy3VjQCfb3uxB/MdSj8KHKsNx8GnXQGe /mYAn1kNpEQjperhdkE+WkIr32Lr7Vpn =IIV2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Nov_19_16_59_54_2012_643)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121119.165954.1302634823989942540.hrs>