Date: 20 Feb 2003 16:43:49 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: Rui Lopes <rui@ruilopes.com> Cc: billf@mu.org, kkuehl@cisco.com, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: ethereal-0.9.7 Message-ID: <1045777429.472.38.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <49676.217.129.151.119.1045776652.squirrel@webmail> References: <001501c2d761$f9e92180$0601a8c0@amer.cisco.com> <20030218210457.GC20055@elvis.mu.org> <1045771765.375.23.camel@gyros> <49649.217.129.151.119.1045774480.squirrel@webmail> <49658.217.129.151.119.1045774971.squirrel@webmail> <1045775078.472.18.camel@gyros> <49676.217.129.151.119.1045776652.squirrel@webmail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-oXMAUnIzTZf1R4p/WqUh Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 16:30, Rui Lopes wrote: > > On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 16:02, Rui Lopes wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 16:04, Bill Fumerola wrote: > >> >>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 07:25:32AM -0800, Kirby Kuehl (kkuehl) > >> wrote: > >> >>> > Ethereal 0.9.9 is out, I would be sending you a patch, but all I > >> >>> had > >> >>> to do was change PORTVERSION=3D 0.9.9 > >> >>> > and do make makesum > >> >>> > >> >>> just because something builds doesn't mean it's ready to go. > >> >>> > >> >>> see the thread beginning at: > >> >>> http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-dev/200302/msg00062.html > >> >>> > >> >>> and then you can send me a patch. i haven't really spent much > >> time figuring out if this is bsd.port.mk magic or something new > >> that ethereal is doing. > >> >> > >> >> Bill, here is a patch that upgrades ethereal to 0.9.9. It fixes > >> the weird binary tagging, adds support for net-snmp instead of > >> ucd-snmp since the latter doesn't work with OpenSSL 0.9.7, and is > >> no longer maintained, and de-pkg-comments the port (thus you need > >> to remove pkg-comment upon commit). It also adds new plist items. > >> > > >> > I would try using, > >> > > >> > CONFIGURE_TARGET=3D --build=3D${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL= } > >> > > >> > instead of, > >> > > >> > CONFIGURE_ARGS=3D --program-transform-name=3D"" > >> > CONFIGURE_TARGET=3D --target=3D${MACHINE_ARCH}-unknown-freebsd${OSRE= L} > > > > Yes, this works as well. >=20 > yes it works, but IMHO "--build" is a better choice. don't you think so? Yes, one line is better than two if it does the same job. Joe >=20 --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-oXMAUnIzTZf1R4p/WqUh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+VUwVb2iPiv4Uz4cRApDKAKCqyxiiydEcnw4DEcPYMhg1IbqmtgCgmHy8 M4/XGKWdmJHyQguXHJCOFrs= =V0pP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-oXMAUnIzTZf1R4p/WqUh-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1045777429.472.38.camel>