Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 23:37:27 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: David Johnson <djohnson@acuson.com> Cc: Mit Rowe <mitayai@branchmedia.com>, freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Message-ID: <20010716233726.A44647@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <3B5320E2.2E887874@acuson.com>; from djohnson@acuson.com on Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:14:10AM -0700 References: <DBEMKGPNFGOGJHLMDNDJKEEBCFAA.mitayai@branchmedia.com> <3B5320E2.2E887874@acuson.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: David Johnson <djohnson@acuson.com> Subject: Re: Date: Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:14:10AM -0700 > Mit Rowe wrote: > > > At this time FreeBSD is just too unstable for ChiliSoft to support. > > Well, if they consider Linux to be more stable than FreeBSD then > consider what the stability of their own products must be like. Maybe > that's why they haven't released FreeBSD versions yet, they keep > crashing on FreeBSD even though it's their own software's fault. Well, yes. Without proper debugging, it's easy to assume that the OS does something to crash an application. And proper debugging, is not something that I've learned to expect from a commercial entity :/ -giorgos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010716233726.A44647>