From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat May 17 10:24:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA03020 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 17 May 1997 10:24:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matrix.42.org (sec@matrix.42.org [192.68.213.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA03009 for ; Sat, 17 May 1997 10:24:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sec@localhost) by matrix.42.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id TAA08638; Sat, 17 May 1997 19:23:49 +0200 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Path: sec From: sec@42.org (Stefan `Sec` Zehl) Newsgroups: muc.lists.freebsd.hackers Subject: Re: mailing list archives on www.freebsd.org Date: 17 May 1997 19:23:48 +0200 Organization: Internet@home Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <199705151747.TAA01620@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de> X-Newsreader: slrn (0.9.3.0-2 BETA UNIX) Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In article <199705151747.TAA01620@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de>, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > And to get to the problem again: > > how come that nice 20 get 50% CPU against a competing job running at nice > level 5? Hmm, i really don't know :) but you could put the nice20 process on idletime-priority (man idprio) and you wouldn't even notice that it runs :) Dont know if that helps you though... CU, Sec -- Fuer die Raupe ist es das Ende der Welt, Fuer den Rest der Welt ist es ein Schmetterling Error 0: No error