From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 23 13:31:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586449C2; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roger.pau@citrix.com) Received: from SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM (smtp.eu.citrix.com [46.33.159.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D1613A; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:31:01 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,728,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="4899385" Received: from lonpex01cl03.citrite.net ([10.30.203.103]) by LONPIPO01.EU.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 23 May 2013 13:30:54 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.30] (10.30.203.1) by LONPEX01CL03.citrite.net (10.30.203.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Thu, 23 May 2013 14:30:53 +0100 Message-ID: <519E1A0C.3070609@citrix.com> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 15:30:52 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeroen van der Ham Subject: Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing References: <519131D8.9010307@citrix.com> <647F6650-AEED-4784-8A45-98324860EE0A@dckd.nl> In-Reply-To: <647F6650-AEED-4784-8A45-98324860EE0A@dckd.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.30.203.1] Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" , xen-devel , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" , "xen-users@lists.xen.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:31:02 -0000 On 23/05/13 15:20, Jeroen van der Ham wrote: > > On 13 May 2013, at 20:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> Also, I've created a wiki page that explains how to set up a FreeBSD >> PVHVM for testing: >> >> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Testing_FreeBSD_PVHVM > > > You mention on that page that it is easier to install on 10.0-CURRENT snapshots. > What are the issues with installing this on 9.1? Is it possible? I don't think it is recommended to use a HEAD (10) kernel with a 9.1 userland. You can always install a 9.1 and then do a full update with the source on my repository.