From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Jul 12 23:29:42 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA14157
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 12 Jul 1996 23:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA14145
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 1996 23:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id XAA00419; Fri, 12 Jul 1996 23:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199607130629.XAA00419@root.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: Kent Vander Velden <graphix@iastate.edu>
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: your mail 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Jul 1996 00:05:53 CDT."
             <9607130505.AA09823@spiff.cc.iastate.edu> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@root.com>
Reply-To: davidg@root.com
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 23:29:33 -0700
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>
>In message <199607130417.VAA00390@root.com>, davidg@root.com writes:
>>>On Thu, 11 Jul 1996, Kent Vander Velden wrote:
>>>
>>>>   Is the Intel EtherExpress Pro 100 PCI 100Mbps ethernet card support
>>>> with either -stable or -current?
>>>
>>>Not yet.
>>
>>   The Pro/100 isn't supported, but the Pro/100B is. Which one do you have?
>
> It would appear to be a Pro/100B.  There was an additional notes in the
>packages stating that it was rather important to use the Pro/100B
>drivers.  However the package does not mention it.
>
>  On startup I get this message:
>
>pci0:20:    Intel Corporation, device=0x1229, class=network (ethernet) 
>int a irq 11 [no driver assigned]

   Right, device 0x1229 is the Pro/100B. It's supported in both -stable (soon
to be 2.1.5-RELEASE), and -current.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project