From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 15 17:33:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F0416A4CE for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:33:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ojoink.com (center.ojoink.com [216.65.123.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887F743D55 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:33:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amd64list@jpgsworld.com) Received: (qmail 33038 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jun 2004 17:32:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MAINBX.jpgsworld.com) (amd64list@jpgsworld.com@24.10.96.33) by center.ojoink.com with SMTP; 15 Jun 2004 17:32:39 -0000 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040615102224.015312c0@mail.ojoink.com> X-Sender: amd64list@jpgsworld.com@mail.ojoink.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:32:47 -0700 To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org From: JG In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20040615101805.015f6028@mail.ojoink.com> References: <20040615171225.711.qmail@web14107.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: Possible Threading problem with -CURRENT / MySQL? X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:33:23 -0000 >Claus, > >I think this problem applies to a recent (< 1 month) change in -CURRENT >and that is most likely why you have not had any problems. > >- Jeremy It should be said that this may not be a discussion for freebsd-threads and instead might belong more on freebsd-kernel or freebsd-smp - since according to Daniel Eischen, (who has commit privileges) "there were no changes to the threads library that would exhibit the behavior..." I guess my early benchmarks suggested it was more of a kernel / SMP problem as well... figuring we would get damn near the same results on a UP kernel on an otherwise identical configuration. I suppose that on it's own warrants a post to freebsd-smp no? - Jeremy