From owner-freebsd-ports Sun May 7 9:50: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from t-mta4.odn.ne.jp (mfep4.odn.ne.jp [143.90.131.168]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B373D37B568; Sun, 7 May 2000 09:50:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shigeisp@pop02.odn.ne.jp) Received: from athena.shige.org ([210.188.11.140]) by t-mta4.odn.ne.jp (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP id <20000507165002718.RWFG.890.t-mta4.odn.ne.jp@mta4.odn.ne.jp>; Mon, 8 May 2000 01:50:02 +0900 To: reg@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@cs.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: Proposal for USE_* directives in Mk/bsd.port.mk From: Shigeyuki Fukushima (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCSiFFZ0xQRzcbKEI=?=) In-Reply-To: <20000430120305.C309@shale.csir.co.za> References: <20000430105058.B309@shale.csir.co.za> <20000430181355835.KOJS.890.t-mta4.odn.ne.jp@mta4.odn.ne.jp> <20000430120305.C309@shale.csir.co.za> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b3 on Emacs 20.5 / Mule 4.0 =?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQjJWMWMbKEIp?= X-URL: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~shige/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 01:49:54 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 20 Message-Id: <20000507165002718.RWFG.890.t-mta4.odn.ne.jp@mta4.odn.ne.jp> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org From: Jeremy Lea Subject: Re: Proposal for USE_* directives in Mk/bsd.port.mk Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 12:03:05 -0700 Hi. > USE_* are not user options, and should *never* be set from the command > line. WITH_* and WITHOUT_* are user options. If you want the port to > do this (I don't think it is useful - are you going to support two MD5's?): Is this an official policy? Would you like to show me difference between USE_* and WITH_*(WITHOUT_*) and HAVE_*. Is this policy already documented? Thanks. --- shige (Shigeyuki Fukushima) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message