From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Oct 11 03:06:59 1995
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id DAA03105
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 03:06:59 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA03098
          for <ports@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 03:06:54 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id DAA20797; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 03:06:46 -0700
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 03:06:46 -0700
Message-Id: <199510111006.DAA20797@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com
CC: ports@freefall.FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <19372.813405805@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Subject: Re: This assumes /usr/local/share/nls exists?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Argh!  You want me to back my changes out?  They don't *hurt* anything
 * and could be considered extra insurance, but I'll also nuke them if
 * they're considered cruft.

Yes, I'd prefer that.  Since it's going to be in 2.1 for sure, I don't
see any need to make the tcsh Makefile any more unreadable than
necessary. :)

Satoshi