From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 6 00:49:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B392716A421; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 00:49:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail16.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail16.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD5713C468; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 00:49:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from c220-239-235-248.carlnfd3.nsw.optusnet.com.au (c220-239-235-248.carlnfd3.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.235.248]) by mail16.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l560nFSp016024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:49:22 +1000 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:49:17 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@delplex.bde.org To: Jeff Roberson In-Reply-To: <200706050412.l554CkdC019916@repoman.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20070606104316.U51903@delplex.bde.org> References: <200706050412.l554CkdC019916@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_4bsd.c sched_ule.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:49:24 -0000 On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Jeff Roberson wrote: > jeff 2007-06-05 04:12:46 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/kern sched_4bsd.c sched_ule.c > Log: > - Better fix for previous error; use DEVOLATILE on the td_lock pointer > it can actually sometimes be something other than sched_lock even on > schedulers which rely on a global scheduler lock. > > Tested by: kan In another reply, I wrote: >> Should know better than to use __DECONST: C programmers. Should know that using __DEVOLATILE is 100 times worse than using __DECONST: C programmers. Bruce