From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 12:34:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C217F16A420; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:34:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@tao.org.uk) Received: from mailhost.tao.org.uk (transwarp.tao.org.uk [87.74.4.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B6343D46; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:34:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@tao.org.uk) Received: from genius.tao.org.uk (genius.tao.org.uk [87.74.4.41]) by mailhost.tao.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7118C5C20; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:34:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: by genius.tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100) id 917424073; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:34:16 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:34:16 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser To: Gleb Smirnoff Message-ID: <20060226123416.GF39469@genius.tao.org.uk> References: <20060219151435.GE15477@genius.tao.org.uk> <20060226102756.GE55275@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060226102756.GE55275@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Default gateway - wrong interface. ! X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:34:20 -0000 --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 01:27:56PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 03:14:35PM +0000, Josef Karthauser wrote: > J> I'm guessing that this is a bug (or feature!). >=20 > This is not a bug, nor a feature. This is a feature, that hasn't > been implemented to the end. >=20 > Historically, the routes in kernel were static. And they are static > now. Historically, BSD won't permit you to install same IP addresses, > or even addresses in the same subnet, on different interfaces. Now, > FreeBSD permits addresses in the same subnet. But route entries are > still static, and aren't reconfigring when an interface changes its > flags. I expected it was something like that, but I thought I'd still make a little noise about it in case someone was right on the verge of having it fixed :). Joe p.s. have you seen kern/93305? It looks like my em0 still has a few problems. Would you mind taking a look? --=20 Josef Karthauser (joe@tao.org.uk) http://www.josef-k.net/ FreeBSD (cvs meister, admin and hacker) http://www.uk.FreeBSD.org/ Physics Particle Theory (student) http://www.pact.cpes.sussex.ac.uk/ =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D An eclectic mix of fact an= d theory. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkQBoEcACgkQXVIcjOaxUBYLxwCfVS2poWqAnxFJDhgW3D3U/i1A lN0An3V79illWy964YlCppSPBn+B6rTU =RQqs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2--