From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Thu Oct 29 03:07:36 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5452A8C7E
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:07:36 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FF371F41
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:07:36 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t9T37aS8068479
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:07:36 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 204092] benchmarks/iperf3: update to 3.1
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:07:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, needs-qa, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: bmah@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bmah@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-204092-13-6Ewv1IgiAH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-204092-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-204092-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:07:36 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204092

Bruce A. Mah <bmah@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|New                         |Open

--- Comment #4 from Bruce A. Mah <bmah@FreeBSD.org> ---
With the bug in this state, am I supposed to review and commit the patch or
give approval for someone else to commit it?

Either way is fine, I'm just unsure of the protocol at this point since
maintainer-feedback is set to ?, I'm the owner of the bug and the port
maintainer.

(And the diff looks fine, thanks for the reporter for doing this.  I should
have done this myself when I did the upstream iperf3 release.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.