From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 14 01:13:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84F116A419; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:13:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik@cepheid.org) Received: from mail.cepheid.org (aleph.cepheid.org [72.232.60.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C380A13C458; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:13:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik@cepheid.org) Received: by mail.cepheid.org (Postfix, from userid 1006) id 4AEA79B4001; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:53:49 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:53:49 -0600 From: Erik Osterholm To: Zuk Zuk Message-ID: <20080214005349.GA10465@aleph.cepheid.org> Mail-Followup-To: Erik Osterholm , Zuk Zuk , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org References: <7978cb0a0802131434v26ee5bf3ra55e6ed673221a3b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7978cb0a0802131434v26ee5bf3ra55e6ed673221a3b@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ln accross ssh X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:13:06 -0000 On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:34:11PM -0800, Zuk Zuk wrote: > Why does "ln" not work with ssh ? > ln -s works across mounted file systems. > > If an ln -s worked with ssh then I could just do > > ln -s ssl://source_host@host_dir my_mount_point > or ln -ssh source_host@host_dir my_mount_point > > > and then any other command, i.e., > cd would be able to go ahead and interpret this as a request for ssh session > . The reponsibility of further commands lies with the new session. Being > able to scp from that directory is equivalent to having read permissions to > it . > .... > sure many people would have thougth about this.. just wondering why its not > there yet? Look in ports for sysutils/fusefs-sshfs. I believe that it will do what you want. And I think this really belongs in -questions. Erik