From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 18:09:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B27F35C for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:09:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEFBEC0; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51129BFE.1000803@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:07:58 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130128 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: AN Subject: Re: libreoffice update fails References: <5111416B.6030901@FreeBSD.org> <5111AEF4.10307@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:09:33 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-05 20:38:39 -0500, AN wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 2013-02-05 19:03:01 -0500, AN wrote: >>> The build is still failing. >>> >>> FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #33 r246130: >>> Wed Jan 30 15:00:08 EST 2013 >>> root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 >> >> ... >> >>> gmake[2]: *** >>> [/tmp/lobuild/workdir/unxfbsd.pro/CustomTarget/testtools/uno_test.done] >>> >>> >> >>> Segmentation fault (core dumped) >> >> ... >> >> Hmm, interesting... You can try this patch to bypass the test: >> >> http://svn.redports.org/office/editors/libreoffice/files/patch-testtools__Module_testtools.mk >> > >> > Can I copy and paste this into a text file and put it in > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/files/? Yes. Or you may directly fetch it from the directory. :-) >> I haven't seen this kind of failure for very long time, BTW. >> Probably you have mixed environment, too. > > What do you mean by "you have mixed environment"? Is there > something I should do to correct it? Mixing binaries built with different C++ headers/libraries is nothing but asking for trouble. When people build it from pristine environment, they don't experience this type of build problems because of that reason. Probably you can fix the problem by rebuilding all dependencies with *base* compiler. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJREpv+AAoJECXpabHZMqHOR3cH/jPCSulXjn1SAy1FdpN44vC7 gOfyfhlyXe1Mj7VW4MfsrzpCSBs9VhSqczisrFqLjOttsgXbnNWs16dmGSXb7+aB PhlADzi5EKE6wWIoYQTWnT5DlACxkE1aOWIYxu4CZ8xGqJGNrMK3VtG3zOici4s+ +uy2KQ7F4nhfxIGclZaYiTxLD5cB+neGIFiTHIR45BGY9k1eEBFpcD69q97NUNpw 6eZaGSLR9MPU73hLU7TKT1zDOzytDRATKx6ZLZudpMIL6GdWZZ/KR/NUJLhRNqcR DKbRLy9z2VfeBBQ67PBwLGmPBMFyBMlqHxfZgHQ6nai5xvuGri0yu7UoBwvaKi0= =jUWk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----