From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Aug 21 15:56:44 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id PAA16100 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 15:56:44 -0700 Received: from isgate.is (isgate.is [193.4.58.51]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA16091 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 15:56:30 -0700 Received: from hlunkur.islandia.is by isgate.is (8.6.10/ISnet/14-10-91); Mon, 21 Aug 1995 22:56:08 GMT Received: by hlunkur.islandia.is (8.6.11/ISnet/12-09-94); Mon, 21 Aug 1995 22:45:50 GMT Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 22:45:49 +0000 () From: Hordur To: "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: Why freeBSD instead of Linux? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 21 Aug 1995, Ugen J.S.Antsilevich wrote: > For years IBM writing OS/2 , and as much as OS/2 is strange and perverted it's > nice system to some degree and for sure it's MUCH better then windows. > But... whatever you say and what reasons you find Windows used thousands > of times wider, even though Windows is just a crap (and i hope nobody going to > argue THAT) and OS/2 is not-such-a-bad-system... > Something similar is happening with Linux and FreeBSD and probably this is > going to be continued whatever we do..1 > --Ugen I hope you are not saying that the difference between linux and freebsd is similar as win/os2 difference. Don't think there is that much difference. Hordur Johannsson.